IN YOUR FACE, RESEARCH!

How facial recognition can revolutionize consumer engangement.

Market research often leads to epic failure. And while the word “research” is normally associated with science that leads to product innovations for a better living and economical prosperity, things are unfortunately the other way round in the marketing industry.

With research institutes asking people artificial questions and getting artificial, irrelevant
results that appeal to the rational thinking related part of our brain (neo cortex) – which may be best suited for giving clever answers but not for giving even the slightest hint on how the customer feels and what his true insights are – most brands are waisting money and
opportunities on an grand scale.

But help is on the way! Rana el Kaliouby and her MIT Media Lab colleagues are the minds behind Affectiva, an ambitioned start up
with the potential to rewrite the rules of marketing research and consumer engagement.

Affectiva invented Affdex Facial Coding, an automated facial-expression-recognition technology able to measure and even interpret
viewers´ emotional responses to brands, advertising campaigns an any other digital video content.
Good news for the few people in Adland that are capable of telling the story behind their clients´ brand in an emotional way and relevant way.

Facial Coding will finally seperate the wheat from the chaff when it comes to analazing and understanding consumers needs, feelings and wishes. “You can understand so much about how consumers perceive a brand by analyzing their spontaneous,
subconscious responses. If you are a contant creator looking to elicit a certain emotion, we can validate that. In cases where an ad
is trying to elicit e.g. humor, we can tell you if people consider it funny.”, el Kaliouby reveals in the US magazine Entrepreneurs´ January issue.

The Affdex software works with any standard webcam across connected laptops, tablets and smartphones, paying tribute to fact that consumers
interact with brands via various screens and putting emphasis on multichannel marketing as well.

“People chek their phones an average of 150 times a day – to us, that´s an exciting opportunity, el Kaliouby points out.

And to all creatives in the advertising industry, Affdex is a big step towards getting adequately paid for a great idea.
Not to mention getting rid of time wasting & redundant focus groups or telemarketer surveys by – literally – technical knockout…

RETHINK RESEARCH.

Most advertisers believe in research. It´s a religion to them. Why? Because it delivers a bunch of good feelings. In the meantime, there are some brands who rather believe in what they believe in. Ideas. Potential. Opportunities.

Henry Ford didn´t produce faster horses now, did he?

Jobs and Wozniak didn´t do any research. After all, research suffers from the “re” in it. Research is only about what has been. Not what will be. And if there is any vision in research, it´s the vision of playing it safe. Which kills creativity. Which again kills a brand and the story behind it before it has been written. Safety is the illusion, failure is the result.

But there´s always two sides of a story, right? If we just condemn research (like I just did) we´ll hardly change anything. Not the brands we work for. Not the work we live for. Nothing. So let´s have a look at why research is still everybody advertiser´s darling and how we can end that phenomenon for the sake of beloved brands.

Martin Weigel, chief planner at W+K Amsterdam, names some of the myths we have to deal with.

 #1 RESEARCH ELIMINATES RISKS

Wrong. It can´t. The opposite will be the case. Colin Powell says why:

“Don´t take action if you only have a 40% chance of being right, but don´t wait until you have enough facts to be 100% sure, because by then it is almost always too late… Procrastination in the name of reducing risk actually increases risk.”

#2 RESEARCH IS REALITY

Research and reality have two things in common. The “R” and the “e”. Imagine the following situation: people are sitting in a badly air conditioned room, having bad coffee and old cookies. Everybody´s wearing a nameplate.

They are shown some ads with a burger and some french fries on it. Then they are shown a menu. With prices. Then they are asked what they would order at the drive-thru. Burgers? Nuggets? Fries? Salad? Shakes? What about the food photography?

Are the prices reasonable? Etcetera…

There´s just a few problems also caged in that badly air conditioned room:

- no one in there is hungry

- no one in there is in a hurry

- no one in there drives thru

Research is as real as the food shots on the ads are. At best.

#3 RESEARCH IS RELIABLE

Are you bonkers? It´s not. Clotaire Rapaille, a french psychiatrist and brand consultant tells us why. Actually he already told us more than 10 years ago.

But time moves slowly in adland, doesn´t it?